Ville også klart vælge dual core løsningen. Evt vente lidt til der kommer nogen rigtig fede desktopboards til den nye core duo cpu, idet en pentium D ligger mellem 90 - 135watt ved max load og en core duo bruger ca 35watt. Selvom core duo cpu´en ikke er samme MHZ som pentium D, følger den fint mked alligevel..
personligt vil jeg mene at denne er den bedste pentium D prismæssig
http://edbpriser.dk/Listprices.asp?ID=174249 synes ikke det er værd at give over 500kr for 200mhz xtra i forhold til den pinball foreslår
Eller en core duo cpu
http://edbpriser.dk/Listprices.asp?ID=179154Based on what we've seen, one can't help but conclude the Core Duo's performance per watt is unmatched in the world of PC processors. The Core Duo is obviously the best mobile CPU on the market, more than doubling the peak performance of the Pentium M while operating in the same power envelope. What's more shocking is the fact that the Core Duo T2600's outright performance is easily superior to Intel's supposed flagship desktop processor, the Pentium Extreme Edition 965. Given its performance, the Core Duo is clearly well-suited for desktop use, where performance is king but quiet computing is still a blessing.
Taget fra konklusionen i denne 16 siders test af core duo
http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q2/core-duo/index.x?pg=1Personligt ville jeg vente de 1-2 måneder der går til intels nye conroe cpu kommer. Den kommer virkelig til at sparke røv samtidigt med den vil have et væsentligt lavere strøm forbrug end Pentium D.
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713&p=1While we're still comparing to Socket-939 and only using RD480, it does seem very unlikely that AMD would be able to make up this much of a deficit with Socket-AM2 and RD580. With Conroe's performance advantage averaging over 20% it looks like Intel's confidence has been well placed.
Taget fra konklusionen
