I et åbent brev til Europa-Parlarmentet udtrykker Linus Torvalds bekymring over det kommende patentdirektiv, der skal førstebehandles i morgen tirsdag.
- Udviklingen i USA viser, at patenter på software i modsætning til almindelige patenter ikke fremmer innovationen. Det vil svække markedet og øge omkostningerne til at tage patenter og føre retssager på bekostning af forskning og udvikling, skriver Linus Torvalds i brevet, der er stilet til parlamentets formand, Pat Cox.
Største trussel mod Linux
Linus Torvalds mener, at patenter er den største trussel mod udviklingen af Linux og anden fri software.
- Patenter skader udviklingen af fri software. Små og mellemstore virksomheder og nye virksomheder får svært ved at klare sig, skriver han.
Til slut opfordrer Torvalds Europa-Parlamentet til kun at stemme for et forslag, der umuliggør patentering af computerprogrammer, algoritmer og forretningsmetoder og som sikrer, at patenter ikke kan blive misbrugt til at hindre, at konkurrerende produkter kan arbejde sammen.
Desuden skal det ikke være muligt at bruge patenter til at forhindre udbredelsen af information, mener han.
Mindre virksomheder også imod
Modstanden mod patentdirektivet er for en stor del kommet fra open source-miljøet, mens især større virksomheder har hilst forslaget velkomment.
I sidste uge meddelte tre organisationer, der tilsammen repræsenterer to millioner selvstændige små og mellemstore virksomheder i Europa, dog at den er imod patentdirektivet.
- Små og mellemstore virksomheder vil få svært ved at dække de store omkostninger, som juraen omkring patenter kræver. Empiriske undersøgelser viser, at softwarepatentering er den dårligste måde at beskytte sine investeringer på for små og mellemstore virksomheder, lyder det i et statement fra de tre organisationer, Cea-pme, Cedi og Esba.
Open Letter to the Honourable Pat Cox, the President of the European Parliament, members of the European Parliament:
Dear Mr. Cox,
We have been following with growing concern that Europe has been extending patentability to computer programs.
Now European Parliament is about to vote on a directive that could put a stop to this development, or make it worse, depending on how it is amended by the Parliament.
US experience shows that, unlike traditional patents, software patents do not encourage innovation and R&D, quite the contrary.
In particular they hurt small and medium-sized enterprises and generally newcomers in the market.
They will just weaken the market and increase spending on patents and litigation, at the expense of technological innovation and research.
Especially dangerous are attempts to abuse the patent system by preventing interoperability as a means of avoiding competition with technological ability.
Standards should never be patentable! Likewise, patents should never be used as means for preventing publication of information - the whole idea of patents is to provide time-limited monopoly in exchange for publication of the invention.
Software patents are also the utmost threat to the development of Linux and other free software products, as we are forced to see every day while we work with the Linux development.
We want to be able to provide the world with free high class, high quality, highly innovative software products that really empower the users and offer the best and only real chance to narrow the digital divide.
Please do not make this harder to us that it already is! In conclusion, we would recommend You to vote for such amendments that clarify limits of patentability so that computer programs, algorithms and business methods really cannot be patented as such; make sure that patents cannot be abused to avoid technical competition by preventing interoperability of competing products; and ensure that patents cannot be used to prevent publication of information.
To that end we would suggest following FFII's voting recommendations on this directive (see www.ffii.org).
Sincerely,
Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox
